|
"Switching
Gears" Can Cut Your Energy Costs
|
|
by Brian Schmitz,
Emerson Gearing, Division of Emerson Electric Company
|
| When trying to improve overall
system efficiency, most people initially look to the electric motor. And
while it is true that switching to an energy efficient motor is a smart
investment in most cases, this is only part of the overall efficiency equation. |
| Most conveyor OEM's have
long standardized on worm gear reducers due to their low initial cost,
long service life and ability to withstand high overloads. However, one
of the drawbacks of worm gear reducers is their relatively low efficiency,
especially at ratings below 20:1. |
| Take, for example, a constant
speed belt conveyor system. The conveyor operates 4,000 hours per year
and is driven by six, 2 HP, poly-phase induction motors mounted to worm
gear reducers with 40:1 ratios. The efficiency of the worm reducers is
67%. Each motor is operating at full load and has a nominal efficiency
of 82%. |
|
In our example you can see that an obvious candidate for replacement with
a more efficient product is the worm gear reducer (see Figure 1). While
a few points of efficiency can be gained from using a more energy efficient
motor, much more can be realized from using a more efficient reducer combined
with the original motor. |
|
|
Figure 1
|
|
Much has been written about replacing worm gear reducers with their much
more efficient cousins, in-line helical reducers. Making this change would
not only offer energy savings from higher reducer efficiency, but also
the opportunity to reduce motor horsepower. |
|
Clearly, by implementing this type of solution, significant savings will
be obtained by reducing kilowatt consumption since the motors would be
operating at less than 3/4 load. In fact, the efficiency of induction motors
actually increases slightly when operating at 75 percent load! |
|
However, it is the role of the PT/MC distributor to educate customers that
spending numerous man-hours of labor changing from one product to another
could quickly eat up any potential energy savings. Changing from a right
angle worm gear to an in-line helical reducer in this instance might also
be questionable in its true cost savings, since implementation of this
product change would necessitate a fair bit of re-work to the existing
conveyor system. |
| Other Options |
|
Right angle worm and in-line helical are the two most common types of gearing
today in the industrial marketplace. However, there are other types of
gearing which should be considered and may provide a better overall solution.
The PT/MC distributor recommending a change in the type of gearing on any
piece of equipment must not only be concerned with efficiency, but other
factors such as: |
-
Initial cost
-
Repairability
-
Ease of installation
-
Availability
-
Ability to withstand overload
conditions
-
Expected life
|
|
The chart in figure 2 shows that changing the type of reducer involves
making a number of trade-offs between these attributes. The goal is to
choose a reducer with the right performance characteristics while maximizing
efficiency. |
|
|
Figure 2
|
|
In the case of our conveyor example, the configuration and average overload
capability of the in-line helical reducer may not make it the best choice,
even though it offers the highest efficiency (see figure 1). A better choice
may be a helical-worm reducer, which offers only slightly lower efficiency
than the in-line helical while preserving the configuration and overload
capability of the original worm reducer. |
|
A comparison of total yearly energy costs reveals that only a small portion
of the potential energy savings has been compromised (see figure 3). However,
the energy savings compared to the original product are quite dramatic
and will more than justify the increased cost of the helical-worm gear
reducer. |
|
|
Figure 3
|
|
The ability to make similar intelligent choices for users make PT/MC distributors
an invaluable resource. These professionals can help determine the most
cost efficient solution for any application. Utilizing their expertise
will help to evaluate total energy consumption and the best options for
your operation. |
|
This article is provided
courtesy of PTDA.
|
|
Return
to Gears Reference Articles Index
|
|
© Copyright 2007
Maintenance Resources, Inc.
|
|
Phone: 812.877.7119
- Fax: 812.877.7116 - E-Mail: info@maintenanceresources.com
|
|
Address: 1983 North Hunt
Street - Terre Haute, IN 47805
|
|